WWLLN
World Wide
Lightning Location
Network
SYSTEM MESSAGE:
This page is not maintained and may be out of date. RHH
The University of
Washington in Seattle, is operating a network of lightning location
sensors at VLF (3-30 kHz). Most ground-based observations in the VLF
band are dominated by impulsive signals from lightning discharges
called “sferics”. Significant radiated electromagnetic power exists
from a few hertz to several hundred megahertz, with the bulk of the
energy radiated at VLF.
With our network of sferic sensors we are producing regular maps of
lightning activity over the entire Earth. Our map showing the entire
world uses coloured spots
to indicate lightning strokes (red stars inside an open circle are
active
WWLLN ightning sensor locations). Click on the map to expand.
WWLLN, managed by the Prof. Holzworth at the University of Washington, produces
these data with the cooperation of the
universities and institutes which host the stations as listed below.
Wideband
VLF
spectrograms below show lightning-generated sferics (vertical
lines) from our
lightning sensors and narrowband signals (horizontal lines) from VLF
transmitters. Each spectrogram spans 15s in time (horizontal axis) and
24kHz in frequency (vertical axis) All start at precisely the same time
at exactly 0, 10, 20, ... min past each hour. Click on any thumbnail
below to expand it to full size (or click on its caption to open it on
a new page).
We currently have over 20 sensors logging sferic activity in the VLF
band, listed below in the order of their establishment:
| Dunedin |
University of Otago/Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo (New Zealand)
|
| Darwin |
Charles Darwin University (Australia)
|
| Brisbane |
Griffith University, Brisbane
|
| Perth |
Murdoch University, Perth
|
| Singapore |
National University of Singapore
|
| Ōsaka |
Ōsaka University
|
| Moscow |
Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation (ISMIRAN)
|
| Budapest |
Eötvös Lorand University |
| Seattle |
University of Washington |
| Boston |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| Durban |
University of KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa)
|
| São Paulo |
INPE (Brazilian National Institute for Space Research) |
| Suva |
University of the South Pacific (Fiji)
|
| Los Alamos |
Los Alamos National Laboratory |
| México |
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México |
| Tahiti |
Universite de la Polynesie Francaise |
| Tel Aviv |
Tel Aviv University |
| Sheffield |
University of Sheffield |
| Lisbon |
Portugal Meteorological Institute |
| Trivandrum |
Centre for Earth Science Studies (India)
|
| Huancayo |
Instituto Geofisico del Peru |
| Puerto Rico |
University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez |
| Córdoba |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (Argentina) |
| Finland |
Sodankylä Geophysical Observatorya, Sodankylä, Finland |
| Honolulu |
University of Hawaii at Manoa |
| Rothera |
British Antarctic Survey |
| Lanzhou |
Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Insitute, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
| Ascension Is. |
British Geological Survey and BAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How it works
We welcome offers of hosting a new
WWLLN sensor to add to the list above. All hosts receive all the
world-wide data for their own research on monthly CDs. In
return, each host provides the computer and meets any local expenses
like power, Internet, and maintenance. However, do not think that
a sensor on your own campus is going to give you lightning location
data on its own. Only the whole network does that.
Each lightning stroke location requires the time of group arrival
(TOGA) from a least 4 WWLLN sensors. These sensors may be several
thousand km distant from the stroke. In fact, there is some evidence to
suggest that the sensors close to the lightning stroke are unhelpful.
The geographical arrangement of the sensors is important: a
lightning stroke which is enclosed by sensors is much more accurately
located than one which is not so enclosed. Clearly a uniform spacing of
sensors around the Earth is the ideal. Since the Earth is round, there
are no edges: every lightning stroke is surrounded by sensors, but
not necessarily by the sensors which sense it. Currently (2004) only
about 50% of strokes detected by one sensor are detected by 4 or
more. These strokes are presumably the stronger ones.
To cover the whole world by sensors spaced uniformly about 1000 km
apart would require roughly 500 sensors. If spaced 3000 km apart, we
would need “only” around 50 sensors. We already have about half this
number: mainly in developed countries but not enough in less-developed
countries, many of which are in the tropics where lightning
is most prevalent.
So if you are interested in hosting, have a look at the current WWLLN
station
locations (white circles with a red asterisk inside) on the World map
linked above to see where new WWLLN stations would be useful. Note that
every WWLLN station needs a dedicated computer (linux box) permanently
connected to the Internet for continuous transmission of data to the
central processing computers which make the lightning strike locations.
Anyone interested in becoming a host for a new WWLLN VLF sferic
receiving station may like to look at our
Do It Yourself manual . If you are
able to provide the inexpensive hardware shown in this document, and
the internet connection, we will send you our global lightning data for times
that your station is operating and sending sferic data to the network.
Direct Weather
comparison

WWLLN map with superimposed cloud
viewed by satellite (updated periodically)
(also see other views
Americas or
Europe/Africa )
(Thanks to National Weather Service/Aviation Weather Center for images of cloud cover).
More information
More information on the World
Wide Lightning Location network (WWLLN) is available from the main web page http://webflash.ess.washington.edu:
bobholz@washington.edu
Webpage written by:
Craig J Rodger (University of Otago)
Robert Holzworth
(University of Washington)
Lightning image thanks to
photolib.noaa.gov